Main Article Content
Objective: In our study, it is aimed to remove the cast more easily and safely without using the cutting tools by leaving the cast ends marked by folding in the idiopathic clubfoot patients treated with Ponseti method.
Material and Methods: Forty feet of 29 patients treated for Pes Equinovarus were included in the study. Patients were followed up in two groups. The group treated with Ponseti method by cast marking were named as “modified group” and cast wrapped group without marking were named as “classical group”. Neurological, teratologic and syndromic clubfoot patients were not included in the study. During the six series of casting, cast removal times for each extremity are recorded in minutes and it is noted that whether any additional cutting tool is used during cast removal or not. A summary of the data was presented as mean, standard deviation and percentage. Comparisons of the categorical characteristics were analysed by using the Chi-square test and the Mann-Whitney test. IBM-SPSS 20 program was used for analysis. In all tests, the level of significance was adjusted to 0.05.
Results: Thirteen (44.8%) of the 29 patients were male and 16 (55.2%) were female. While the mean time to start treatment for the 15 patients in the modified group was 3.46 (2-7) days, mean time for the 14 patients in the classical group was 3.78 (2-10) days. While the mean cast removal time of the 20 extremities of 15 patients in the modifying group was 10.9 minutes (8-14.3 min);it was 22.2 minutes (17.1-29.5 min) for the 20 extremities of 14 patients in the classical group. While no additional cutting tool was used during cast removal in the modified group, additional cutting tools were used during removal of cast in 75% (15/20) of the patients in the classical group and statistically significant difference was found between two groups in terms of the use of cutting tools (p<0.001).
Conclusion: We found that the cast ends’ being marked by folding during plastering in idiopathic clubfoot patients treated with Ponseti technique is costless, easy to apply, significantly shortens cast removal time, does not require the use of cutting tools, and thus is a notably safe method for these patients.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
2. Tindall AJ, Steinlechner CW, Lavy CB, Mannion S, Mkandawire N. Results of manipulation of idiopathic clubfoot deformity in Malawi by orthopaedic clinical officers using the Ponseti method: a realistic alternative for the developing world? J Pediatr Orthop. 2005 Sep-Oct;25(5):627–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bpo.0000164876.97949.6b PMID:16199944
3. Ponseti IV. Treatment of congenital club foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992 Mar;74(3):448–54. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199274030-00021 PMID:1548277
4. Halanski M, Noonan KJ. Cast and splint immobilization: complications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008 Jan;16(1):30–40. https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200801000-00005 PMID:18180390
5. Sadruddin N, Chinoy MA, Javed MI. Soak the cast off. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2007 Jun;17(6):380–1. PMID:17623597
6. Agarwal A, Shaharyar A, Kumar A, Bhat MS. Ponseti Casting Technique: using the Flags. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2016;25(2):126–7. PMID:27518300
7. Shabtai L, Specht SC, Herzenberg JE. Worldwide spread of the Ponseti method for clubfoot. World J Orthop. 2014 Nov;5(5):585–90. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v5.i5.585 PMID:25405086
8. Staheli L. Clubfoot: Ponseti Management [3rd Edition]. Global HELP Organization 2009.p.12.
9. Lohan I. Treatment of Congenital Clubfoot Using the Ponseti Method Workshop Manual [2nd Edition]. Global HELP Organization 2011.p.31.